Conventions
Axioms
A weak Hopf algebra (Böhm–Nill–Szlachányi) over a field is a tuple satisfying the axioms below.
Sweedler notation is used throughout, with summation implicit.
Hover a property to see which axioms it constrains.
Unchanged from the Hopf case. The weakening never touches the algebra structure itself.
Also unchanged. Everything “weak” lives in how the coalgebra interacts with the algebra, not in either one alone.
Δ is an algebra map. This axiom is identical in the Hopf and weak Hopf settings.
Relaxation of multiplicativity of ε. It becomes ε(ab) = ε(a)ε(b) exactly when Δ(1) = 1 ⊗ 1.
Relaxation of Δ(1) = 1 ⊗ 1. This is the axiom whose degeneracy separates weak Hopf from Hopf.
Target and source maps. Their images are the counital subalgebras A_t and A_s.
The three BNS antipode axioms. They reduce to the classical identity when A_t = K1.
Together with the corner axiom Δᵒᵖ(1) R Δ(1) = R and weak invertibility of R.
The single governing invariant of the whole database:
Hence is strict: every Hopf algebra is weak Hopf, and any entry with is provably not Hopf.
Fields
c x[n·.o·.g·]: c copies, n objects, o = , g = index of among groups of order o.+, and .1x[n1.o4.g2] is ; 1x[n2.o1.g1] is ; 4x[n1.o1.g1] is .true iff , equivalently .fusion iff that unit is simple; otherwise multifusion.unknown when the base field does not split the algebra.true iff a universal R-matrix exists.n1-n2-….1-1-…-1: the catalog is the split commutative cell, .Scope
REP is unknown.unknown over , fusion over with simples .Structure constants
p or p/q.1,-1/2,3 is .RING reads QQ or CYCn.